faq

FAQs

For many, MiniDisc flew under the radar. Why did people use MiniDisc in:

the 1990s?

At the turn of the 1990s, CDs had overtaken vinyl LPs as the primary distribution medium for new music. CDs offered a digital signal that would not degrade over time, did not require changing sides, and allowed for convenient track controls such as track skip and repeat.

But portable and recordable audio was still centered around the Compact Cassette tape. Following a small format war, MiniDisc emerged as the de facto successor to the cassette tape by the mid-90s. Compared to the cassette tape, MiniDiscs:

  • had no background hiss
  • did not need to be rewound or reversed
  • are less than one-third the volume (24.5cm^3 vs. 82cm^3)
  • can contain track and disc titles
  • do not degrade with multiple listens
  • are much more sturdy
  • provide superior audio quality

And compared to portable CD players (Discman), MiniDiscs:

  • have universal anti-skip protection
  • are [much] smaller
  • are recordable
  • boast longer battery life
  • are much more durable

For these reasons, MiniDisc was a welcome successor to the cassette and was a more convenient alternative to the CD player as a portable music format. Professional audio applications benefitted greatly from the MiniDisc's track queueing features and accessible, high quality recordings.

the 2000s?

Once the format had matured, battery life and audio quality improved even more, while player size shrunk. MDLP and NetMD were introduced early in the decade and allowed for up to 320 minutes of audio to be copied to a single disc from a PC.

Compared to CD-Rs or even MP3 CD-Rs, MiniDisc continued to be more portable, more durable, and support recording.

And compared to the low-capacity early MP3 players, MiniDisc recorders were more flexible (replacing discs rather than expensive SD cards or built-in storage) and had more presence in home decks and car stereos.

Before the format was discontinued, Hi-MD recorders were released that allowed for larger capacity discs and new audio codec options.

the 2010s and beyond

We're still here today for a few reasons:

  • Nostalgia - You previously used MiniDisc, and want to learn more about the format, or start collecting / using it again.
  • a e s t h e t i c s - The MiniDisc format is a showcase of 90s and early 00s industrial design, a characteristic that pairs it well with the vaporwave and synthwave genres.
  • Pro audio - MiniDisc was widely used in broadcasting, live audio, and studio recording. A large amount of the format's equipment, knowledge, and recordings are in the professional space.
  • Pro audio. MiniDisc was widely used in broadcasting, live audio, and studio recording. A large amount of the format's equipment, knowledge, and recordings are in the professional space.

According to reddit, there are over 1000 subscribers to /r/minidisc.

Why did people use MiniDisc when it was on the market?

Although it had limited success in North America, Japan adopted the MiniDisc quite widely. The format was designed to replace the aging cassette tape and did so with various new features: near-CD quality digital audio, fast skip and rewind, longer record times with no need to change sides. The discs were more reliable and reusable than tape, with no degradation in quality. MD was later updated to include PC connectivity (NetMD), long play modes (MDLP2 and 4), and even larger capacities.

Why did people NOT use MiniDisc when it was on the market?

There are a number of reasons, and they changed throughout the format's existence. Initially, recorders were large, with poor battery life (See: MZ-1) and could not compete with the established cassette tape. The North American market also preferred portable CD players and both Canada and the United States faced legislative battles regarding MiniDisc's digital recording functionality. Later, the rise of CD-R drives in PCs (combined with broadband internet) and MP3 players changed how (portable) music was consumed entirely. Sony tried to counter this with the NetMD addition and later Hi-MD, but it was too late to counter technology such as the iPod.

Why should I start using a dead music format?

The most common reasons are nostalgia (you use MD decades ago); aesthetics (you're into Vaporwave, Synthwave, and similar genres); archival (you have access to rare recordings from when the format was used professionally or as an amateur recording device); and novelty (older formats have quirks and challenges that make them rewarding, and represent nearly two decades of (mostly Sony) development and design)

I want to collect MiniDiscs - how do I get started?

Start by watching some of the videos on the Resources page for a primer. Then you can begin searching for your first player / recorder. Depending on your location, eBay shipping prices may be higher than a local classified site such as Craigslist, Kijiji, or FB Marketplace. Because eBay has many more listings than local ads will, it may be worth the cost to have your first buy be a lot (recorder and discs) with a known description and condition.

What are the common pitfalls of the format?

Recorders themselves have quite small mechanisms that are impossible to be repaired by an amateur. As they have moving parts, all players will eventually fail or degrade in performance. Luckily, many machines are well designed and built, but hardware issues are inevitable. Discs are often overpriced, with some listings at more than US$10 per disc. When ordered as part of a used lot (MiniDiscs are reusable near-infinitely) or direct from Japan, a disc should never exceed US$4 (as of 2020).

Should I get a portable recorder, or a deck?

That depends on how you plan to use the format, but portables are more available and have lower shipping costs. The format was also designed for portable use, with very small players, great battery life, and impressive anti-skip. Because all portables can output over a standard 3.5mm (aux) jack and nearly all support recording, I would advise starting with a portable player and adding a deck if you're committed to the format.

  • faq
  • Last modified: 10 days ago
  • by 62.171.162.127